Sunita Vishwanath, the Executive Director of Hindus for Human Rights in America, has written some such words in the media there that are not complete
Today, when I saw this news in the media, I felt very sad that Sunita Vishwanath, the Executive Director of Hindus for Human Rights in America, has written some such words in the media there that are not completely correct but rather wrong.
He wrote that "the inauguration ceremony is an 'election gimmick' and such things should not be done in the name of religion. 'Modi is not a priest, hence performing the consecration ritual himself for political gain is unethical and wrong in every way.'
So now Sunita Vishwanath will tell the Hindus of the world what is wrong and what is right. Any person who leads any organization should avoid giving such wrong and misleading views in the media. Due to such ideas, the Hindus are troubled by the leftists present in India and the people who have converted from the Hindu religion to others, whose names are like Hindus but after converting, they run a special agenda and attack the devotion and faith of Hindu religion.
These leftist people say in the media that Sanatan Dharma respects atheists and leftists. I don't know which scripture of Sanatan Dharma he quotes and says this. They should tell the name, chapter, and verse of that scripture, where it is written that Sanatan Dharma respects atheists and leftists.
Let us assume that even if he respects, has he got the certificate to reform or change Sanatan Dharma? He should think about this as a human being.
Now let me talk about Sunita Vishwanath, Executive Director of Hindus for Human Rights in America, who while sitting in America came to know that "The inauguration ceremony is an 'election gimmick' and such things should not be done in the name of religion. 'Modi is not a priest. Therefore, performing the consecration ritual yourself for political gain is unethical and wrong in every way.
Here, being an ordinary Sanatani Hindu, I tell what is right according to me so that the people of the world remain cautious of such people who have negative views on the internal affairs of any religion or country.
1. The inauguration ceremony is an 'election gimmick' and such things should not be done in the name of religion.
What I think - If the inauguration ceremony is an 'election gimmick' then why was this gimmick not used by any other party? If people from other parties hold Iftar parties then the country is secular, but if any steps are taken for the revival of other Hindu religions then how did it go wrong?
They should raise their voice when -
An Indian party said that the Hindu religion is like mosquitoes of malaria and dengue, they should be eradicated.
An Indian party insulted the holy book of Hindus, burnt it, and trampled it
2. Modi is not a priest, hence performing the ritual of consecration himself for political gains is unethical and wrong in every way.
What I think - Sunita Vishwanath should read Hindu scriptures, in which even a person in the highest position like a king takes part in the installation of the idol.
The media of a big constitutional country like America should be cautious of such people who are targeting any religion for their politics. Such comments on Shri Ram Temple are shameful.
![]() |
Image Source - Public Domain |
COMMENTS